builds and works on amd64.
Mitch
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Ljuba Nedeljkovic <ljuba....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please find attached updated port's tarball with suggested fixes. One
> deviation from kn's tarball is removal of `patches/patch-nlay` file and
> doing shebang fix using LOCALBASE with `post-extract` target. Said
> patch leaves literal `#!${LOCALBASE}/bin/bash` in installed `nlay`
> script and breaks it.
>
> Thanks everyone for taking time to review and advise the work. Special
> thanks to kn@ for coaching and guidance that made this first attempt
> at porting software to OpenBSD pretty painless.
>
> Best,
> -ljuba
>
> On 13.03, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> From: Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org>
>> To: Ljuba Nedeljkovic <ljuba....@gmail.com>
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Subject: Re: [New] nnn-1.7
>> Reply-To:
>> In-Reply-To: <20180311203948.wqkdu5kxbhlrg...@lada.probisvet.io>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 09:39:48PM +0100, Ljuba Nedeljkovic wrote:
>> > On 10.03, mitchell wodach wrote:
>> > > I get this error when I run "make test"
>> > >
>> > > openbsdcurrent# make test
>> > > ===> Regression tests for nnn-1.7
>> > > gmake: *** No rule to make target 'test'. Stop.
>> > > *** Error 2 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2777
>> > > '/usr/ports/pobj/nnn-1.7/.test_done')
>> > > *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/myshit/sysutils/nnn
>> > > (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2419 'test')
>> > >
>> > > Try adding NO_TEST=Yes. to your Makefile
>> >
>> > Fixed. New tarball is attached to mail with most remarks.
>> Almost there. With GH_* set you can leave DISTNAME as described in
>> Makefile.template or bsd.port.mk(5) for that matter.
>>
>> See my attached tarball fixing this besides some whitespace issues and
>> other small nits; I've also taken care of the completion scripts.
>>
>> /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/portcheck also tells if your port seems
>> fine, in that case it would warn you about an empty line in PLIST.
>
>
