On 2018/01/25 04:07, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:10:55PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > On Tue Jan 23, 2018 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > + > > > # libarchive (bsdtar) used as an alternative to atool; see scope.sh patch > > > RUN_DEPENDS = archivers/libarchive \ > > > - textproc/py-chardet > > > + devel/desktop-file-utils \ > > > > [...] > > > > > +@exec %D/bin/update-desktop-database > > > +@unexec-delete %D/bin/update-desktop-database > > > > > > > Please don't pull that in for a console file manager. > Those came in for completeness (portcheck also complains without them) > but I can see why one would rather ignore it.
I wonder if we should come up with a better policy for console apps with desktop files, as obviously it's useful to update the database if you *do* have a desktop environment. Any thoughts on using "@exec %D/bin/update-desktop-database || true" (etc) and not listing the desktop-file-utils dep *only* for console apps? What do you think Antoine?
