> On 2017-03-13 05:34, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> ..
> > Note that the value is the total allocated bytes for javascript. It
> > isn't a initial value, and it shouldn't grow (if I correctly understand
> > the code). So I expect 128 Mo to be a bit "restrictive".
> ..
> > +-static const size_t MaxCodeBytesPerProcess = 1 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024;
> > ++static const size_t MaxCodeBytesPerProcess = 128 * 1024 * 1024;
>
> So Firefox has a blanked fixed-heap size model for all of its
> deployments??
>
> If so, that is like, ridiculously archaic, what were they thinking. I
> wonder if it can be made to run in a dynamic heap model. I can't see why
> Wikipedia and alert("Hello world"); would take up any much memory at
> all, like, more than the binary and dep libraries + 1-100MB allocations.
Yet again the diff in your email didn't come through!
Are you using some weird encoding that the project mailserver doesn't
allow through?
