On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:11:37PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Antoine Jacoutot: > > > I am just asking because if we go this way, then I will need to change 1000 > > ports to add stuffs like devel/glib2 in LIB_DEPENDS because glib-2 is in > > WANTLIB which I think is a bit silly. > > So if the end result is the same, all I am saying is that for *my* ports, > > I'd rather keep LIB_DEPENDS as small as possible. As long as I can keep > > doing it, then fine. > > It's at the maintainer's discretion.
Good. Thanks for clarifying. -- Antoine
