Antoine Jacoutot: > I am just asking because if we go this way, then I will need to change 1000 > ports to add stuffs like devel/glib2 in LIB_DEPENDS because glib-2 is in > WANTLIB which I think is a bit silly. > So if the end result is the same, all I am saying is that for *my* ports, I'd > rather keep LIB_DEPENDS as small as possible. As long as I can keep doing it, > then fine.
It's at the maintainer's discretion. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
