On 2015/12/09 20:33, Patrik Lundin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:15:04PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2015/12/08 23:59, Patrik Lundin wrote: > > > I have posted a question to kea-dev regarding this: > > > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/kea-dev/2015-December/000588.html > > > > > > Let's see how that goes. > > > > Good idea. > > > > I have recieved a response now. As I do not think there is an > overwhelming reason for using Botan I feel it is nicer to skip > additional port dependencies and explicitly use our LibreSSL instead. > > The question remaining is if the configure flag should be --with-openssl > or --with-openssl=/usr. While it seems the configure script will look > for the library in an order that starts with /usr, I wonder if it is > nicer to be explicit that we want to use the base version (rather than > the openssl port for instance). > > Attached is a port with the explicit flag set and a shortened > LIB_DEPENDS/WANTLIB list. I have tested that it ignores the use of Botan > when it is installed. Let me know what you think.
Either way is OK, I deliberately put the ports version of OpenSSL in a directory that is unlikely to be searched by configure. (Unless it uses something like the bonkers locate(1) check that freeradius3 uses, but I digress...) Any OKs to import this version?
