On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:15:04PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/12/08 23:59, Patrik Lundin wrote: > > I have posted a question to kea-dev regarding this: > > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/kea-dev/2015-December/000588.html > > > > Let's see how that goes. > > Good idea. >
I have recieved a response now. As I do not think there is an overwhelming reason for using Botan I feel it is nicer to skip additional port dependencies and explicitly use our LibreSSL instead. The question remaining is if the configure flag should be --with-openssl or --with-openssl=/usr. While it seems the configure script will look for the library in an order that starts with /usr, I wonder if it is nicer to be explicit that we want to use the base version (rather than the openssl port for instance). Attached is a port with the explicit flag set and a shortened LIB_DEPENDS/WANTLIB list. I have tested that it ignores the use of Botan when it is installed. Let me know what you think. -- Patrik Lundin
kea,3.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
