Kenneth Westerback <kwesterb...@gmail.com> writes: > On 5 October 2015 at 11:51, Josh Elsasser <j...@elsasser.org> wrote:
[...] >> I thought I'd jumped in here but it looks like not. >> >> This builds and appears to pass tests on macppc, and builds an sbcl >> which also passes its tests. >> >> The fact that the configure script appears to be discovering and >> hardcoding random memory addresses is concerning, but I guess it was >> doing that already. >> >> Anyway, I'm OK with this and please feel free to remove me as >> maintainer and add yourself. My only interest in clisp is for >> bootstrapping sbcl anyway. > > Now I just feel bad. :-(. I'm ok with this going in as well unless you > want to wait for a sparc64 test. No need to wait! Markus Lude kindly reported that clisp packaged correctly on sparc64 and passes its regress test suite. Which means that amd64, i386, powerpc and sparc64 are fine (read: no worse than with clisp-2.48). I will now commit this, but will leave MAINTAINER empty. I don't want to have nightmares with clisp like I've had with emacs. ;) Thanks, -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
