On 2 October 2015 at 08:27, Kenneth Westerback <kwesterb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 October 2015 at 08:18, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote: >> Kenneth Westerback <kwesterb...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 30 September 2015 at 04:11, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Last night I ran ''make; make clean'' in a loop on i386 and amd64. >>>> >>>> amd64: 142 builds / 0 failures >>>> i386: 58 builds / 2 failures >>>> >>>> (same failure as yours) >>>> >>>> Maybe this has something to do with this... >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> checking for the code address range... 0x16000000 >>>> checking for the malloc address range... 0x87000000 >>>> checking for the shared library address range... 0x2D000000 >>>> checking for the stack address range... 0xCF000000 >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> -- >>>> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE >>> >>> Black magic as far as I am concerned. :-) >> >> 2.48 fails at the same rate on i386. >> >> -- >> jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE > > In which case I would consider it fine to upgrade. :-) > > My sparc64 is resisting me but I hope to overcome it's reluctance > today and start a build on -current. > > .... Ken
It's still resisting. I am getting worried about it. :-( .... Ken
