On 2015/09/09 13:02, Edd Barrett wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9 September 2015 10:42:12 BST, Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >The only supported update mechanism is to build new packages and point
> >pkg_add -u at them, "make install" and "make update" will not work
> >when changes like this are made. For changes like this where the stem
> >of the package name changes, you'll also need an entry in the quirks
> >package produced by ports/devel/quirks.
> 
> Ah, so @pkgpath is not enough?

@pkgpath tells pkg_add that it can be considered as a replacement for
another pkgpath. But first you need to get pkg_add to know that it should
even download that file at all, if the package stem is different then it
won't normally do that, and that's what quirks does.

> Starting to wonder if we should bother moving this at all...

It's fairly straightforward to do, just needs doing correctly and testing.
But it's annoying enough that people need to think carefully about PKGNAMEs
at initial import time :-)

Reply via email to