On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Mike Burns <mike+open...@mike-burns.com> wrote:
> On 2014-12-04 12.30.00 -0800, Jeremy Evans wrote: > > But for ruby ports, there is little reason to add ports for pure ruby > > gems if nothing else in the ports tree depends on them. > > But is that also true for programs which happen to be written in Ruby, > such as sass? No. If a port is being added so the program can be used, and not just for usage as a ruby library, then yes, it's fine. In that case we do not flavor the port, and the port is named after the program (without the ruby- prefix), and the binary isn't versioned (sass, not sass21). sysutils/god is such a existing port. frantisek, is the reason you want to add the port because of the sass program? If so, you should rename it to just sass and make sure the above is true. Thanks, Jeremy
