On h, dec 23, 2013 at 18:20:12 +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" <czark...@gmail.com> writes: > > > LEVAI Daniel said: > >> I don't mind having the pwsafe convert utility around, I just tought > >> that generally the expectation is that if something gets installed, then > >> it should (or supposed to) work :) If it's enough (from the user point > >> of view) that perl will warn the user that some modules are necessary > >> for running said program, then I'm okay with installing it henceforward. > >> If this is the case, I guess the pkg-readme could also stay, but with > >> some modifications that mention the perl module dependency. Is this an > >> acceptable standard in the ports tree? > > > > I would drop the readme from the patch and either drop it from PLIST or > > (if it is worth having) make a subpackage. > > I don't think the complexity of subpackages are worth it, I'd just ship > the script as is, with a note in the readme.
This seems fine, but why did you remove the test target? Daniel -- LÉVAI Dániel PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F Key fingerprint = DBEC C66B A47A DFA2 792D 650C C69B BE4C 83B6 3A8F
