On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 02:25:42AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:06:06PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > >> > >> Huh, I thought I had sent this mail... *shrug* > >> > >> - updating clisp to 2.49 > >> - texlive make build and make fake work fine; pkg/PLIST changed but > >> that doesn't seem to be due to the clisp update > >> - updating sbcl to 1.1.11 (using clisp-2.49 as a host) > >> - note: sbcl/INSTALL lists supported clisp versions: "(only some > >> versions: 2.44.1 is OK, 2.47 is not)"... > >> - patch committed yesterday doesn't apply and isn't needed anymore > >> - but a new struct timeval problem has been introduced in > >> contrib/sb-posix/constants.lisp :) > >> - two other errors in contrib/, maybe (?) linked to the one above, to > >> the clisp update, or... just plain regressions > >> > >> dpb running on powerpc now, sbcl's make test on i386 not yet finished. > >> That stuff takes a long time to build... > >> > >> WIP diff at the end of the mail. > > > > Compiled w/o problems on amd64 and macppc so far. Will see if I can > > get an i386 machine building a port while I wait for the rest of my > > macppc ports to build. I'm looking at you firefox! > > > > Then run some regress ... > > > > .... Ken > > I've done tests on i386 and macppc. All is well wrt. sbcl, except that > there are tests on macppc that succeed while upstream said they > shouldn't. Good thing? No idea so far. About clisp, I'm wondering > about the changes that seem to have occurred: no more "full" setup in > the PLIST, but more dynamically loadable modules > > I'm trying to sort this out, expect more input before the end of the > week. > > Cheers, > -- > jca | PGP: 0x06A11494 / 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
You can look at ~krw/sbcl/sbcl1.1.8.regress.macppc to see if any tests results have changed. If they haven't, I'd go ahead and commit your diff. And tweak more afterwards. .... Ken
