On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Josh Elsasser wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:29:40AM +0200, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: > >> > > >> > So instead of struggling with clisp, let's just update sbcl first. > >> > Regress tests results and diff below. I'm postponing clisp for now. > >> > > >> > More tests on amd64 / ok? > >> > >> There should be a build-time (and probably runtime) dependency on gmp, > >> or else the gmp contrib should be disabled. I'm not sure if it's right > >> to enforce a runtime dependency when few users will use sb-gmp, but it > >> would also be annoying to start splitting off contribs into separate > >> packages. > > gmp is opened using load-shared-object (dlopen), the build system > doesn't search for it (but we should keep in mind that one day it > might use sb-grovel to detect the size and signedness of gmp objects). > Given this, plus the fact that it is a relatively new and probably > seldom used module, I don't think adding gmp to bdeps/rdeps would add > much value. > > What I should have done, though, is to put gmp in TEST_DEPENDS. > > Josh, do you agree with this? > > > I don't use gmp > > Are you sure? :)
OK, I should have said "I'd don't consciously use gmp." :-). .... Ken > > > (or even know what it is) so I don't have a strong > > preference one way or the other on disabling it. I agree starting > > to split off contribs is a longer term idea even if deemed desirable. > > > > So I would go for whatever is minimal change to make 1.1.12 work. > > And leave anything else for future work in-tree. > > > > .... Ken > > -- > jca | PGP: 0x06A11494 / 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
