On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:36:39AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Reading the history section of macppc.html > I see that the port has been called both > 'macppc' and 'powerpc' in the past. > > Now that the architecture is called 'macppc' (since 3.0), > why is it that the corresponding packages subdirectory > is .../packages/powerpc?
Look at the difference between 'arch' and 'arch -k'. macppc shares packages with socppc, they are both powerpc. Landry
