The last information I received from Edd was that he was doing a refactoring on this with ajacoutot@
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Landry Breuil <lan...@rhaalovely.net> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:24:31AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >> Anyone? > > So it seems this feels into the cracks... can it be updated to 0.2.2 / > revived to use new PERMIT*/TEST* stuff so this finally gets commited ? > > Landry > >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda >> <acam...@the00z.org> wrote: >> > RUN_DEPENDS in meta/zathura/Makefile shouldn't be: >> > >> > RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/zathura-core ? >> > >> > it currently is: >> > >> > RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/zathura \ >> > >> > Isn't textproc/zathura supposed to be deleted...? Or I'm missing >> > something... >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Edd Barrett <vex...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Any further comments? Can I commit this? >> >> >> >> On Aug 9, 2012 3:24 PM, "Edd Barrett" <vex...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Zathura-0.2.0 again; this time with all the plugins (bar one which is >> >>> broken). >> >>> >> >>> The plan is still the same: blast away textproc/zathura in favor of >> >>> meta/zathura with @pkgpath set. This was neccessary due to the new >> >>> plugin architecture of zathura. >> >>> >> >>> Misc notes: >> >>> - mupdf plugin is broken (our mupdf is too new). Can we import this >> >>> plugin unlinked? Upstream are working on this as we speak. >> >>> - ps plugin does not support searching. >> >>> - update path seems to work fine. >> >>> - should the meta package contain *all* plugins? Currently contains >> >>> only the poppler PDF plugin so as to emulate the old zathura-0.8.*.*. >> >>> >> >>> Comments? OK? Pizza? >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Best Regards >> >>> Edd Barrett >> >>> >> >>> http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk >>
