On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 02:24:31AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > Anyone?
So it seems this feels into the cracks... can it be updated to 0.2.2 / revived to use new PERMIT*/TEST* stuff so this finally gets commited ? Landry > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda > <acam...@the00z.org> wrote: > > RUN_DEPENDS in meta/zathura/Makefile shouldn't be: > > > > RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/zathura-core ? > > > > it currently is: > > > > RUN_DEPENDS = textproc/zathura \ > > > > Isn't textproc/zathura supposed to be deleted...? Or I'm missing > > something... > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Edd Barrett <vex...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any further comments? Can I commit this? > >> > >> On Aug 9, 2012 3:24 PM, "Edd Barrett" <vex...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Zathura-0.2.0 again; this time with all the plugins (bar one which is > >>> broken). > >>> > >>> The plan is still the same: blast away textproc/zathura in favor of > >>> meta/zathura with @pkgpath set. This was neccessary due to the new > >>> plugin architecture of zathura. > >>> > >>> Misc notes: > >>> - mupdf plugin is broken (our mupdf is too new). Can we import this > >>> plugin unlinked? Upstream are working on this as we speak. > >>> - ps plugin does not support searching. > >>> - update path seems to work fine. > >>> - should the meta package contain *all* plugins? Currently contains > >>> only the poppler PDF plugin so as to emulate the old zathura-0.8.*.*. > >>> > >>> Comments? OK? Pizza? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards > >>> Edd Barrett > >>> > >>> http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk >
