On 2012/11/05 12:54, Marc Espie wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 11:08:40AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > > > > Unless a workaround/fix is found, maybe we should consider removing > > py-qt3. Only games/mnemosyne and databases/luma use it. > > Well, maybe this is just a poor choice of words, but the first thing to > do is to fix the issue, possibly by working with the sip guys or making > them aware of it.
I've fixed it by patching PyQt3, very little activity there any more, they've only made about 2 minor commits since the last release. I'll drop Phil a mail though, he only removed the macro recently, date: Fri Sep 14 10:53:18 2012 +0100 summary: Removed the ANY SIP v3 compatibility macro as it causes problems with Qt v5. > Saying "hey, those are old ports, let's just remove them and forget about > the work that's been done to put that in" makes me cringe more and more. > > Another way to look at it: do you have user replacements for mnemosyne > and luma that provide the same functionality, or close enough that dropping > them doesn't mean LESS functionality from the ports tree ? Don't know about mnemosyne, but there aren't all that many ldap admin tools, so I'd rather not drop luma just for the sake of avoiding a simple fix ;)
