On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Amit Kulkarni <amitk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Index: patches/patch-Modules_FindFreetype_cmake >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: patches/patch-Modules_FindFreetype_cmake >> diff -N patches/patch-Modules_FindFreetype_cmake >> --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 >> +++ patches/patch-Modules_FindFreetype_cmake 4 Nov 2012 22:13:08 -0000 >> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ >> +$OpenBSD$ >> +--- Modules/FindFreetype.cmake.orig Mon Nov 5 02:04:32 2012 >> ++++ Modules/FindFreetype.cmake Mon Nov 5 02:05:10 2012 >> +@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ find_path(FREETYPE_INCLUDE_DIR_ft2build ft2build.h >> + HINTS >> + ENV FREETYPE_DIR >> + PATHS >> ++ /usr/X11R6 >> + /usr/local/X11R6 >> + /usr/local/X11 >> + /usr/freeware >> +@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ find_path(FREETYPE_INCLUDE_DIR_freetype2 freetype/conf >> + HINTS >> + ENV FREETYPE_DIR >> + PATHS >> ++ /usr/X11R6 >> + /usr/local/X11R6 >> + /usr/local/X11 >> + /usr/freeware >> +@@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ find_library(FREETYPE_LIBRARY >> + ENV FREETYPE_DIR >> + PATH_SUFFIXES lib >> + PATHS >> ++ /usr/X11R6 >> + /usr/local/X11R6 >> + /usr/local/X11 >> + /usr/freeware > > > strange, why this worked without /usr/X11R6 > > what changed in the meantime? some tightening?
Yeah, very strange. This always used to work without patching. Further investigation is needed :(
