On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Pascal Stumpf <pascal.stu...@cubes.de> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:03:56 +0200, David Coppa wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Pascal Stumpf <pascal.stu...@cubes.de> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:33:45 -0600, David Coppa wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> What do you think about this? >> > >> > What's the gain? >> >> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=134416408711375 >> >> And performances should be far better. >> >> > > As I said, I think something like this would be the clean solution. As > for performance, I don't think libevent is the bottleneck when using > tor, really ... > > (Also needs at least a minor shlib bump) > > Index: event-internal.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libevent/event-internal.h,v > retrieving revision 1.6 > diff -u -p -r1.6 event-internal.h > --- event-internal.h 21 Apr 2010 20:02:40 -0000 1.6 > +++ event-internal.h 27 Aug 2012 09:48:03 -0000 > @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ int _evsignal_restore_handler(struct eve > /* defined in evutil.c */ > const char *evutil_getenv(const char *varname); > > +#define _EVENT_VERSION "1.4.14b-stable" > + > #ifdef __cplusplus > } > #endif > Index: event.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libevent/event.c,v > retrieving revision 1.25 > diff -u -p -r1.25 event.c > --- event.c 30 Aug 2010 07:54:29 -0000 1.25 > +++ event.c 27 Aug 2012 09:48:03 -0000 > @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ event_queue_insert(struct event_base *ba > const char * > event_get_version(void) > { > - return ("1.4.14b-stable"); > + return (_EVENT_VERSION); > } > > /*
I'm ok with this too. nicm? Thanks, David
