On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:03:56 +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Pascal Stumpf <pascal.stu...@cubes.de>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 02:33:45 -0600, David Coppa wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> What do you think about this?
> >
> > What's the gain?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=134416408711375
>
> And performances should be far better.
>
>
As I said, I think something like this would be the clean solution. As
for performance, I don't think libevent is the bottleneck when using
tor, really ...
(Also needs at least a minor shlib bump)
Index: event-internal.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libevent/event-internal.h,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 event-internal.h
--- event-internal.h 21 Apr 2010 20:02:40 -0000 1.6
+++ event-internal.h 27 Aug 2012 09:48:03 -0000
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ int _evsignal_restore_handler(struct eve
/* defined in evutil.c */
const char *evutil_getenv(const char *varname);
+#define _EVENT_VERSION "1.4.14b-stable"
+
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
Index: event.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libevent/event.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 event.c
--- event.c 30 Aug 2010 07:54:29 -0000 1.25
+++ event.c 27 Aug 2012 09:48:03 -0000
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ event_queue_insert(struct event_base *ba
const char *
event_get_version(void)
{
- return ("1.4.14b-stable");
+ return (_EVENT_VERSION);
}
/*
