On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:30:03PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:11:24AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:56:16PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:48:59PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > > I noticed that devel/llvm now has target support for mips64 and > > > > mips64el. The following patch is needed for those two archs. LLVM > > > > builds and seems to work OK from my admittedly basic testing on > > > > mips64el. > > > > > > > > Clang builds only with a newer version of gas (I used 2.22) but it > > > > does not compile anything; it crashes when you try to compile even a > > > > simple Hello World. I've reported it upstream but I'm unable to > > > > follow any of their suggestions - my yeeloong cannot compile clang > > > > with -O0 or a debug build because it runs out of memory (ulimit -d > > > > is maxed at 1G in the kernel). > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > ~Brian > > > > > > You'll likely want the following as well. mips binutils is very > > > fragile, I doubt you want 2.22 and 2.17 in the tree needs more work > > > for mips64. > > > > The additions of __MIPSEB__/__MIPSEL__ and __mips__ are redundant > > over what is already there. __mips64__ is fine. > > actually it is required, in the kernel alone: > > $ fgrep -r __mips__ /usr/src/sys/* | wc -l > 10 > $ fgrep -r __MIPSEL__ /usr/src/sys/* | wc -l > 15 > $ fgrep -r __MIPSEB__ /usr/src/sys/* | wc -l > 22
What I mean is the existing config already has those symbols set. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
