On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Edd Barrett <vex...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 09:30:21AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:05:13 +0200 >> David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'd remove the "Ocamlnet:" part from COMMENT: >> > >> > COMMENT = foundation library focused on internet protocols >> >> I added "Ocamlnet" to COMMENT, because that is exactly the library's >> name. The port is called ocaml-net to have consistent library names. >> (They are all called ocaml-foo). But people looking for Ocamlnet will >> search for exactly that name. Therefore I think including Ocamlnet in >> the comment will make finding it easier. >> Another option would be ocaml-ocamlnet. But that sounds stupid, doesn't >> it? > > I think the COMMENT form is unconventional. > > How about: > COMMENT = the Ocamlnet internet protocol foundation library
ok!
