On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:05:13 +0200 David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Edd Barrett <vex...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:13:20PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote: > >> When I regenerated the PLIST, some .so.owner files turned up too. I am not > >> sure > >> if you removed those on purpose? If you did, you should @comment them so > >> as to > >> indicate their deliberate ommision to others. > > > > Fixed by Chris. > > > >> Still having problems linking the http_download.ml example on sparc64: > > > > Fixed by Chris -- libnetsys.a should be available to non-natives arches. > > Move to PLIST. > > > > Tested sparc64, i386. Tried some example code and works. > > > > OK? > > I'd remove the "Ocamlnet:" part from COMMENT: > > COMMENT = foundation library focused on internet protocols I added "Ocamlnet" to COMMENT, because that is exactly the library's name. The port is called ocaml-net to have consistent library names. (They are all called ocaml-foo). But people looking for Ocamlnet will search for exactly that name. Therefore I think including Ocamlnet in the comment will make finding it easier. Another option would be ocaml-ocamlnet. But that sounds stupid, doesn't it? Christopher > > Apart from this, ok for me.
