On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:32:20PM -0700, Peter Valchev wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski <raf...@sizeofvoid.org> > wrote: > > On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: > >> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@) > >> > >> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch) > >> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch) > >> > >> mikeb@ work with 2.5, no regression found. > >> > >> What should I do? Update current port, or separate port(fvwm2-devel)? > >> > > I don't think that any work with stable branch. In my opinion, separate > > port like fvwm2-devel is the best choice but perhaps, a port like mutt > > with subdirs stable and snapshot (for fvmw unsable) is also good. > > Previously it seemed silly to have 2 versions... what's the motivation > not to stick with -stable? I'm really curious. > > I really don't see the point of two versions, but if there is such a > demand, then stable/snapshot model makes sense.
Prepare stable/snapshot model port. -- Alexandr Shadchin
fvwm2.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
