On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Peter Valchev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Sadowski <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Fri Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:23PM +0500, Alexandr Shadchin wrote: >>> I prepared diff update x11/fvwm2 to 2.5.31 (on request and test mikeb@) >>> >>> current x11/fvwm2 - 2.4.20 (stable branch) >>> last version fvwm2 - 2.5.31 (unstable branch) >>> >>> mikeb@ work with 2.5, no regression found. >>> >>> What should I do? Update current port, or separate port(fvwm2-devel)? >>> >> I don't think that any work with stable branch. In my opinion, separate >> port like fvwm2-devel is the best choice but perhaps, a port like mutt >> with subdirs stable and snapshot (for fvmw unsable) is also good. > > Previously it seemed silly to have 2 versions... what's the motivation > not to stick with -stable? I'm really curious. >
because 2.5 has unicode and freetype support. > I really don't see the point of two versions, but if there is such a > demand, then stable/snapshot model makes sense. > >
