On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Marc Espie wrote: > > > on reflection I'm not so sure about @pkgpath for this, but I think > > > conflict is right. in any event, pkg_add updates would needtesting. > > > > Hmm ok, I though adding an entry in quirks would render the @conflict > > useless in this case. > > No, quirks will only extend the packages considered for updates, the usual > rules still apply afterwards.
Which is why I don't understand @conflict is needed. If the new pkgname is considered for update and that the pkgpath matches, why do we need a conflict? -- Antoine
