On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/02/12 00:30, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > On 2011/02/11 20:58, viq wrote: > > > > There's a typo, but since the package name changes I don't know how it > > > > should be treated. > > > > > > @pkgpath, @conflict and an entry in ports/devel/quirks. > > > > @conflict, really? > > > > > > on reflection I'm not so sure about @pkgpath for this, but I think > conflict is right. in any event, pkg_add updates would needtesting.
Hmm ok, I though adding an entry in quirks would render the @conflict useless in this case. -- Antoine
