On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:26:54PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:32:34PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:13:46PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > Instead of forgetting details of wantlib/depend, now that we have working
> > > version numbers, we could insist they go up.
> > > 
> > > (requires -current pkg_add, as I moved compare from Signature to LibSpec).
> > > 
> > > Does anybody see trouble with this change ?
> > 
> > You'll probably get no feedback if :
> > 
> > - you don't provide an example of what this fixes (you know, usecases)
> > - what does change in output of which tool with errsay ? i suppose in 
> > pkg_create,
> >   but.. an example ? I've never seen 'was updated' in the output of it.
> > - what means 'wantlib/depend go up'. Where, in Makefile, in plistdb, in
> >   +CONTENTS ?
> > - why does 'having working version numbers' changes in the equation
> > 
> > srsly, if you want to get people interested in this, you have to realize
> > we're not as smart as you and we don't grasp your code.
> > 
> > Heck, even i who spent quite a good amount of time reading and
> > understanding infrastructure, i read the diff, and i understand NOTHING
> > to what this changes.
> > 
> > Landry
> 
> register_plist is the basis for PLIST_DB.
> If you have it setup, you'll see things change as soon as you build things.

I use PLIST_DB, and i still don't see what it tries to fix. Care to give
an example ? And again, what means 'wantlib/depend go up' ? they are
already on top of plist file.

Landry

Reply via email to