On 2009/06/25 23:58, Cem Kayali wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I'm getting error while compiling openoffice3. This is 4.5 amd64, and
> most current version of ports. It seems it is because of gcc 4.2.

Just use packages.


> 
> Is this something expected?
> 
> 
> 
> # export FLAVOR="no_java" # make install
> 
> 
> ./classpath/lib/gnu/javax/security/auth/callback/MessagesBundle.properties
> /usr/ports/obj/gcc-4.2.4/build-amgmake[4]: *** [resources] Error 1
> gmake[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/usr/ports/obj/gcc-4.2.4/build-amd64-c++-fortran-objc-java/amd64-unknown-openbsd4.5/libjava/classpath/lib'
> gmake[4]: write error
> gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/usr/ports/obj/gcc-4.2.4/build-amd64-c++-fortran-objc-java/amd64-unknown-openbsd4.5/libjava/classpath'
> gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory 
> `/usr/ports/obj/gcc-4.2.4/build-amd64-c++-fortran-objc-java/amd64-unknown-openbsd4.5/libjava'
> gmake[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/ports/obj/gcc-4.2.4/build-amd64-c++-fortran-objc-java'
> gmake: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
> *** Error code 2
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.2 (line 2189 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.2 (line 1444 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.2 (line 1984 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc/4.2 (line 1474 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice3 (line 1621 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice3 (line 2018 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice3 (line 1444 of
> /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk).
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice3 (line 19#
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Cem
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to