On 2009/06/22 10:01, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:44:48AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > So, if I understand correctly, what you're proposing is pretty much the > > > same as having @no checksum but in a more complicated way? > > > > Yes, except that it's less complicated, because you don't have to > > touch shared-mime-infos plist when a new port that overrides some > > mime infos gets imported into the tree. > > My idea was to set all .xml files provided by shared-mime-info with > @comment no checksum
If I understand correctly, Kili's method means that each port is responsible for its own .xml files, so they are still protected by the checksums, and you don't get a bunch of files installed for software you don't have.
