On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:44:48AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > So, if I understand correctly, what you're proposing is pretty much the > > same as having @no checksum but in a more complicated way? > > Yes, except that it's less complicated, because you don't have to > touch shared-mime-infos plist when a new port that overrides some > mime infos gets imported into the tree.
My idea was to set all .xml files provided by shared-mime-info with @comment no checksum -- Antoine
