On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:59:37PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 03.01.2009 at 20:51:40 +0300, Kirill S. Bychkov <ya...@linklevel.net> > wrote: > > This is a resubmit of apcupsd port. > > Any comments/oks? > > I have no comment on the port, just a question: What would be the > advantage of using apcupsd in favour of nut?
Lacking advantage over nut is not a valid reason why apcupsd shouldn't be imported to ports. There are multiple ports in the tree that do redundant tasks -- it's a matter of choice. I used to use apcupsd myself, and was forced to adopt nut. I don't regret it in any way. > > Kind regards, > --Toni++ >
