Ian McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The real issue for me at least is the fact that one is > prepared to modify (in this case xpdf) away for what ever > standard it is written against, modified away from the > original software distribution without documenting the change, > informing the end user who installs the modified software so > they can make an informed decision as to whether they still > want to use the modified version or go off and install the > unmodified version.
I'd call it a sane default. If we made an xpdf-drm FLAVOR of this port, how many people do you think would choose it? Would you?
