On Saturday 12 January 2008 08:38:39 Marc Espie wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:16:19AM -0300, Andrés wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2008 12:57 AM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Your patch was wrong because Makefile.template should not list LDFLAGS > > > as it currently does. The patch below is correct. > > > > Just to know if we can help to make Makefile.template match reality: > > is there more stuff that shouldn't go there? > > Not really. > > Per-use existing ports. I'm not even convinced Makefile.template is > a good idea. People seem to like it, I never use it.
I feel the same way. bsd.port.mk(5) and examples in the tree are more than good enough. Some people take the template way too seriously, to the point of even putting variables in the same order as the template and other silliness. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
