On Fri, 09 May 2025 17:05:09 +0200, "Lydia Sobot" <chilledfr...@disroot.org> wrote:
> Redict is a fully open-source, community-driven fork of Redis 7.2.4 > OSS. out of curiosity, why did you settle for this particular fork? it doesn't seem to be super active https://codeberg.org/redict/redict/commits/branch/main > I used the UID/GID for Redis for Redict in users.list I guess this is fine since I doubt people will want to have both at the same time. Not sure if they should conflict. > (considering how old the Redis port seems to be, I'm not sure if > replacing it with Redict is a good idea or not) https://github.com/redis/redis/releases/tag/6.2.18 released on April 23rd and updated on April 24th in our ports tree https://github.com/openbsd/ports/commit/6cd29b05b848c786c627f4d1899e6e8810548dc8 Unless you mean I didn't update the ports tree to the 7.X branch (or even the 8.x branch now). But in which case, I haven't heard any compelling arguments to do so (which I'd like to have since I don't think "newer is better" applies here).
