> out of curiosity, why did you settle for this particular fork? > it doesn't seem to be super active > https://codeberg.org/redict/redict/commits/branch/main No particular reason except that it seemed decently maintained to me
>> I used the UID/GID for Redis for Redict in users.list > > I guess this is fine since I doubt people will want to have both at the > same time. Not sure if they should conflict. Ok, but does that mean that Redict should run under the username _redis? > Unless you mean I didn't update the ports tree to the 7.X branch (or > even the 8.x branch now). But in which case, I haven't heard any > compelling arguments to do so (which I'd like to have since I don't > think "newer is better" applies here). I am way out of my depth, but why does "newer is better" not apply here for you? As far as I am concerned, we should try to at least offer the newest version of ports in the tree by default, even as just another flavour
