On Fri Mar 7, 2025 at 12:27 AM CET, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2025/03/06 19:48, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> writes: > > > > > On 2024/07/31 16:32, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > >> Ok with you, Hukadan? > > >> > > >> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=172226686214725&w=2 > > > > > > tb@ pointed out that this breaks with go-1.23rc2: > > > > > > # github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/cmd/gotosocial > > > link: codeberg.org/gruf/go-fastcopy: invalid reference to > > > io.errInvalidWrite > > > > > > This can be worked around with the following snippet: > > > > > > # disable https://go.dev/doc/go1.23#linker to unbreak with go-1.23rc2. > > > # remove either if codeberg.org/gruf/go-fastcopy is fixed, or "existing > > > # usages of //go:linkname found in a large open-source code corpus > > > # remain supported" is extended. > > > MODGO_LDFLAGS += -checklinkname=0 > > > > > > That part can't be committed before go-1.23, and I doubt it would be > > > needed for long, gotosocial is actively developed. > > > > Sorry to ping this thread again, but I don't remember what the result > > was and there has since been an apparently important security release > > https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/releases/tag/v0.17.4 > > that might be nice to have in ports before the next release of OpenBSD? > > If I understand correctly GTS doesn't run properly on OS without coherent > file + mmap access (i.e. unified buffer cache) any more, so we should > probably delete the port..
Hi, @Philip, following this thread, I provided a diff a while ago (at that time to update to 0.17.1). I do not use this port anymore. I don't feel confident in being able to maintain it, especially without being able to test it properly. @Stuart, I agree, I have no objection on my side. Regards, Hukadan
