On Sat, January 11, 2025 05:09, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 23:31:47 +0300
> "Kirill Bychkov" <ki...@linklevel.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, January 4, 2025 19:28, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
>> > On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 18:13:37 -0500
>> > Thomas Frohwein <tfrohw...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like to offer this update to the latest version of gemrb.
>> >> We are a couple of versions behind and this brings it up to date.
>> >> There have been changes to use sdl2 and python 3 as the default
>> >> now. The diff includes a backport of a build fix (iconv-related),
>> >> as well as reversal of some compiler flags that leads to segfaults
>> >> with clang. There is an open issue at [1], and the reporter
>> >> fortunately bisected the commits to the one that can be reverted
>> >> (605519e).
>> >>
>> >> I only tested on amd64. The segfaults from the above issue is gone
>> >> with the revert, and I tested with the beginnings of Baldur's Gate
>> >> and Planescape: Torment.
>> >>
>> >> ok?
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://github.com/gemrb/gemrb/issues/2074
>> >
>> > I missed to regenerate distinfo after switching from github auto
>> > tarball to sourceforge distfile. Fixed patch is attached.
>> >
>>
>> Hi!
>> I have 0.9.2 in my tree. IIRC it breaks fonts in unofficial localized
>> version. I'll test your diff in a couple of days.
>>
>
> Upstream came up with a preferred solution in [1] (see discussion in
> [2]) which works the same for me, so here is a new diff that should be
> the best way for now to run 0.9.3.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/gemrb/gemrb/commit/1edd67203c640c33b8ebc9adcfcf532c53b573bb
> [2] https://github.com/gemrb/gemrb/issues/2074
>

Hi,
Upstream has tagged new release. Updated diff attached.
No runtime tests yet :(

Attachment: gemrb-0.9.4.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to