On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 02:59:54PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:49:11 +0100,
> Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 12:22:34PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > > Index: security/vaultwarden/patches/patch-src_api_icons_rs
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > RCS file: security/vaultwarden/patches/patch-src_api_icons_rs
> > > > diff -N security/vaultwarden/patches/patch-src_api_icons_rs
> > > > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > > > +++ security/vaultwarden/patches/patch-src_api_icons_rs 28 Dec 2024
> > > > 11:14:11 -0000
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> > > > +Index: src/api/icons.rs
> > > > +--- src/api/icons.rs.orig
> > > > ++++ src/api/icons.rs
> > > > +@@ -270,7 +270,8 @@ fn get_favicons_node(dom:
> > > > Tokenizer<StringReader<'_>,
> > > > +
> > > > + let mut base_url = url.clone();
> > > > + let mut icon_tags: Vec<Tag> = Vec::new();
> > > > +- for Ok(token) in dom {
> > > > ++ for maybe_token in dom {
> > > > ++ let token = maybe_token.unwrap();
> > >
> > > while let Ok(token) in dom {
> >
> > Sorry, not enough coffee. Ignore me.
> >
>
> No, I think you're correct and it may lead to a panic.
Yes, the panic is clear, but my suggestion was incorrect.
> Here just this patch which behaves as it should.
ok tb
