On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:45:14 -0600
izzy Meyer <izder...@disroot.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 15:23:12 -0500
> Thomas Frohwein <tfrohw...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:16:28 -0600
> > izzy Meyer <izder...@disroot.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 12:22:18 -0500
> > > izzy Meyer <izder...@disroot.org> wrote:
> > >     
> > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:28:16 -0500
> > > > izzy Meyer <izder...@disroot.org> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > Hello ports@!
> > > > > 
> > > > > PING!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Turns out OpenBSD uses backtrace from -lexecinfo and upstream
> > > > > introduced a bug before releasing 1.3.7 that unintentionally
> > > > > broke -lexecinfo linking on OpenBSD targets.
> > > > > 
> > > > > After a little back-and-forth with the dev on discord as well
> > > > > as in a GitHub PR, we decided to merge a new patch that
> > > > > introduces a LINK variable in the Makefile to future proof
> > > > > other platforms who may not link to _Unwind correctly out of
> > > > > the gate to make porting in the future easier:
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://github.com/ClassiCube/ClassiCube/pull/1281
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch updates games/classicube to 1.3.7 and backports the
> > > > > patch fixing the -lexecinfo bug introduced by upstream.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'd say I'm satisfied enough to get this in our tree? Any
> > > > > committers want to merge if no objections?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Diff is attached.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Peace-
> > > > >       
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ping!
> > > 
> > > Attached.
> > >     
> > 
> > You've attached a tarball, and the files in it seem to be identical
> > to what's currently already in the ports tree. Preferred format for
> > port updates is a diff.
> >   
> 
> Whoops, let me send you the right diff I was tired sending that last
> mail.
> 
> Sorry
> 

Ping! any committers want to look this over? Thanks

-- 
iz (they/them)

> i like to say mundane things,
> there are too many uninteresting things
> that go unnoticed.

izder456 (dot) neocities (dot) org

Reply via email to