On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:13:53 +0200 Kirill A. Korinsky <kir...@korins.ky> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:59:29 +0200, > izzy Meyer <izder...@disroot.org> wrote: > > > > I'll send that makefile patch upstream. Did you see my recent reply > > that upstream fixed things? > > > > I did, they simple disabled using this on OpenBSD. I not sure, but if > upstream goes that way the list of platforms where it is disabled > will be quite long. > > > Why, exactly do we need CXX and not CC here? and most-importantly, > > why does it fix things? > > > > Because Unwind_... is part of libc++abi.so in LLVM. I only may guess > that it's related to the fact exception is available only at C++. > > Anyway, you may see it by: > > nm /usr/lib/libc++abi.so.* | grep _Unwind_ > AH! right that makes sense. I wonder if we can have a platform-specific patch upstreamed so the CXX over CC pr doesn't break things on other platforms. (they support many!) -- iz (they/them) > i like to say mundane things, > there are too many uninteresting things > that go unnoticed. izder456 (dot) neocities (dot) org
pgp0BENP5imK8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
