07.11.2024 14:27, Stuart Henderson пишет: > On 2024/11/07 08:56, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> I think it would be better not to kill this port on base-gcc arches. >> Perhaps make building pzstd conditional? >> >> I'd also worry about an archiver that pulls in ports-gcc causing a >> dependency loop on ports-gcc archs (seems ok now, but perhaps sometime >> in the future). > > Also, multithreaded support was added to zstd itself (-T(number of > cores), or -T0 to autodetect), pzstd has not been recommended for some > time now: > > https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/407#issuecomment-299952807
+1 I don't see a reason to include pzstd and mess with the port.
