On 2024/11/07 08:56, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I think it would be better not to kill this port on base-gcc arches. > Perhaps make building pzstd conditional? > > I'd also worry about an archiver that pulls in ports-gcc causing a > dependency loop on ports-gcc archs (seems ok now, but perhaps sometime > in the future).
Also, multithreaded support was added to zstd itself (-T(number of cores), or -T0 to autodetect), pzstd has not been recommended for some time now: https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/407#issuecomment-299952807
