On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 07:01:07PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Or maybe disable the static library build? >
Yeah, we could go with that for now. The .a is useful for me but I don't think it needs to be built for everyone if compile times are a burden. Perhaps a (pseudo?)flavor could be used to provide a package that contains the static lib, but that package can be skipped by the builders?
