On 2023/11/15 17:04:04 +0100, "Thim Cederlund" <t...@cederlund.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Omar Polo <o...@omarpolo.com> wrote: > > On 2023/11/14 10:30:28 +0000, "Johannes Thyssen Tishman" > > <li...@thyssentishman.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > the subject pretty much says it all. Just like with neomutt, I'd > > > like to suggest making the notmuch dependency optional through a > > > FLAVOR. Cc'd maintainer. Thanks. > > > > I've thought a bit about this, I would agree. notmuch support brings in > > a few dependencies that might be unwanted, for something otherwise > > optional. I didn't do it initally to avoid more headaches with > > go.port.mk, but this seems to work so fine with me provided that Thim > > agrees. > > > > Thanks, > > I agree as well. Most (if not all) of the notmuch integration is > optional either way and will only expand upon aercs core functionality. > Having a flavour will at least give the user some wiggle room to > decide what will be installed.
committed, thanks!
