Hi, Omar Polo <o...@omarpolo.com> wrote: > On 2023/11/14 10:30:28 +0000, "Johannes Thyssen Tishman" > <li...@thyssentishman.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the subject pretty much says it all. Just like with neomutt, I'd > > like to suggest making the notmuch dependency optional through a > > FLAVOR. Cc'd maintainer. Thanks. > > I've thought a bit about this, I would agree. notmuch support brings in > a few dependencies that might be unwanted, for something otherwise > optional. I didn't do it initally to avoid more headaches with > go.port.mk, but this seems to work so fine with me provided that Thim > agrees. > > Thanks,
I agree as well. Most (if not all) of the notmuch integration is optional either way and will only expand upon aercs core functionality. Having a flavour will at least give the user some wiggle room to decide what will be installed. Best Regards, Thim Cederlund
