On Friday 22 June 2007, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > Section #9 states: > > "We recommend you place the license in > > /usr/local/share/doc/<name>/." > > > > If you've already have a /usr/local/share/<name>/ directory for the > > application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share/<name>/doc/ > > directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page), > > is there really any point in also creating the suggested directory > > just for the license? > > Why don't you just call the doc directory > /usr/local/share/doc/<name>/ instead of /usr/local/share/<name>/doc/?
Good question. I wish it was that easy. The trouble is the the app looks to find its' own documentation relative to a base path.
