On Friday 22 June 2007 10:35:15 J.C. Roberts wrote: > If you've already have a /usr/local/share/<name>/ directory for the > application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share/<name>/doc/ > directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page), is > there really any point in also creating the suggested directory just > for the license? > > The port in question is GNU Backgammon, so I doubt there will be much > confusion with this one. On the other hand, if we're using the > suggested /usr/local/share/doc/<name>/ for keeping track of all > licenses of all installed ports, then I can see why it's a good thing.
I don't think we need 100 identical copies of the GPL... this sounds stupid. But that's just me... -- Antoine
