Hi Matthias,
On 23/05/07, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:21:59PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> If i have 2 packages (texlive_texmf-minimal and texlive_texmf-full) of
> which at least one must be installed to build texlive_base. If I
> choose to install the minimal texmf then I will need to patch a config
> file in base. If i install full texmf, then I do not have to patch the
> config file. The config file is read and processed by the port at the
> "make fake" stage and depending upon which you have chosen you will
> get a different packing list.
What exactly are the differences between the original and the patched
config file, and what config file are you talking about? Should it
be something like the ls-R files, than it should be created during
installation of the package (i.e. use @exec/@unexec like in the
teTeX ports).
It is fmtutil.cnf which describes which binaries are available. XeTeX
is not a part of a "traditional" minimal distribution, so the line in
the config file must be commented.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---------------------------------------------------
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
